Table of Contents |
A trait is a temporally stable, cross-situational individual difference. Currently the most popular approach among psychologists for studying personality traits is the five-factor model or Big Five dimensions of personality. The five factors were derived from factor analyses of a large number of self- and peer reports on personality-relevant adjectives and questionnaire items. Five Major Dimensions of Personality
The following are some of the important characteristics of the five factors. First, the factors are dimensions, not types, so people vary continuously on them, with most people falling in between the extremes. Second, the factors are stable over a 45-year period beginning in young adulthood (Soldz & Vaillant, 1999). Third, the factors and their specific facets are heritable (i.e., genetic), at least in part (Jang, McCrae, Angleitner, Riemann, & Livesley, 1998; Loehlin, McCrae, Costa, & John, 1998). Fourth, the factors probably had adaptive value in a prehistoric environment (Buss, 1996). Fifth, the factors are considered universal, having been recovered in languages as diverse as German and Chinese (McCrae & Costa, 1997). Sixth, knowing one's placement on the factors is useful for insight and improvement through therapy (Costa & McCrae, 1992).
The differences between two empirically related yet conceptually distinct models, the Big Five and the five-factor model, are summarized below.
Saucier and Goldberg (1998) presented evidence that nearly all clusters of personality-relevant adjectives can be subsumed under the Big Five. Paunonen and Jackson (2000), however, argued that this study used too loose a criterion for inclusion in the Big Five--namely that the Big Five account for at least 9% of the variance in the adjective cluster. Reanalyzing the same data using a stricter criterion of 20% explained variance resulted in nine clusters of traits that fell outside of the Big Five: Religiosity, Honesty, Deceptiveness, Conservativeness, Conceit, Thirft, Humorousness, Sensuality, and Masculinity-Femininity. These analyses do not imply that the clusters are unrelated; for example, Honesty and Deceptiveness may be highly (negatively) related as opposite sides of the same dimension. Nevertheless, these results suggest that several important personality traits lie beyond the Big Five.
- MAJOR PROPONENTS
- B5: Goldberg
- FFM: McCrae and Costa
- THEORETICAL BASIS
- B5: Lexical hypothesis--those individual differences that are most salient and socially relevant will come to be encoded as terms in the natural language.
- FFM: Theoretical contexts--traits are situated in a comprehensive model of genetic and environmental causes and contexts.
- POSITION ON CAUSATION
- B5: Phenotypic--no stance on causation.
- FFM: Biosocial--genetic as well as environmental.
- NAMING OF FACTORS
- B5: Surgency, Agreeableness, Conscientiousness, Emotional Stability, and Intellect.
- FFM: Extraversion, Agreeableness, Conscientiousness, Neuroticism, and Openness to Experience (OCEAN).
- MEASUREMENT MODEL
- B5: Circular--many items have non-zero correlations (loadings) on two factors rather than just one.
- FFM: Hierarchical--lower-level facets combine to form higher-level domains.
- QUESTIONNAIRES
- B5: Big Five Markers (recently, International Personality Item Pool, or IPIP).
- FFM: Revised Neuroticism, Extraversion, Openness Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R).
- TYPE OF QUESTIONNAIRE ITEMS
- B5: Adjectives (recently, sentence stems).
- FFM: Sentences.
In addition, theoretical reasons suggest the importance of other personality traits that are poorly captured by terms in the natural language, such as impulsive sensation-seeking (Paunonen & Jackson, 2000). Moreover, traits may be only a limited means of studying a "psychology of the stranger"--that is, they may include only the personality-relevant information that would be apparent about someone about whom one knew very little else--leaving uncovered other important constructs such as the narrative life-story (McAdams, 1992).
Extraversion/ Surgency | Agreeableness | Conscientiousness | Emotional Stability | Intellect/ Openness | ||
Adler | Superiority Striving | Social Interest | Superiority Striving | |||
Bakan | Agency | Communion | Agency | |||
Bales | Dominant Iniative | Social-Emotional Orientation | Task Orientation | |||
Bartholomew | Model of Other (Avoidance) (r) | Model of Self (Anxiety) (r) | ||||
Block | Low Ego Control | High Ego Control | Ego Resiliency | |||
Buss and Plomin | Activity | Impulsivity | Emotionality (r) | |||
Cattell | Exvia (vs. Invia) | Pathemia (vs. Cortertia) | Superego Strength | Adjustment vs. Anxiety | Independence vs. Subduedness | |
Comrey | Extraversion and Activity | Femininity | Orderliness and Social Conformity | Emotional Stability | Rebelliousness | |
Costa and McCrae | Extraversion | Agreeableness | Conscientiousness | Neuroticism (r) | Openness | |
Digman | Beta | Alpha | Beta | |||
Erikson | Basic Trust | |||||
Eysenck | Extraversion | Psychoticism (r) | Neuroticism (r) | |||
Fiske | Confident Self-Expression | Social Adaptability | Conformity | Emotional Control | Inquiring Intellect | |
Freud | Psychosexual Development | |||||
Goldberg | Surgency | Agreeableness | Conscientiousness | Emotional Stability | Intellect | |
Gough | Extraversion | Consensuality | Control | Flexibility | ||
Guilford | Social Activity | Paranoid Disposition (r) | Thinking Introversion | Emotional Stability | ||
Hogan | Ambition and Sociability | Likeability | Prudence | Adjustment | Intellectance | |
Horney | Moving Toward | |||||
Jackson | Outgoing, Social Leadership | Self-Protective Orientation (r) | Work Orientation | Dependence (r) | Aesthetic / Intellectual | |
Leary | Control / Dominance | Affiliation / Love | ||||
Maslow | Self-Actualization | Self-Actualization | ||||
McAdams | Power Motivation | Intimacy Motivation | Power Motivation | |||
Myers- Briggs | Extraversion vs. Introversion | Feeling vs. Thinking | Judging vs. Perception | Intuition vs. Sensing | ||
Peabody | Power | Love | Work | Affect | Intellect | |
Rank | Individuation | Union | Individuation | |||
Rogers | Personal Growth | Personal Growth | ||||
Skinner | Socialization | |||||
Tellegen | Positive Emotionality | Constraint | Negative Emotionality | Absorption | ||
Watson | Socialization | |||||
Wiggins | Agency | Communion | Agency | |||
Zuckerman | Extraversion | Psychoticism, Impulsivity, Sensation Seeking (r) | Neuroticism (r) | Psychoticism, Impulsivity, Sensation Seeking | ||
Extraversion/ Surgency | Agreeableness | Conscientiousness | Emotional Stability | Intellect/ Openness | ||
Note: (r) means "reversed scored." (This table is adapted from Digman [1997], Griffin & Bartholomew [1994], John [1990], and McCrae & Costa [1996].)
Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Normal personality assessment in clinical practice: The NEO Personality Inventory. Psychological Assessment, 4, 5-13.
Digman, J. M. (1997). Higher-order factors of the Big Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1246-1256.
Griffin, D. W., & Bartholomew, K. (1994). The metaphysics of measurement: The case of adult attachment. In K. Bartholomew & D. Perlman (Eds.), Advances in personal relationships (Vol. 5, pp. 17-52). London: Jessica Kingsley.
Jang, K. L., McCrae, R. R., Angleitner, A., Riemann, R., & Livesley, W. J. (1998). Heritability of facet-level traits in a cross-cultural twin sample: Support for a hierarchical model of personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1556-1565.
John, O. P. (1990). The "Big Five" factor taxonomy: Dimensions of personality in the natural language and in questionnaires. In L. A. Pervin (Ed.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (pp. 66-100). New York: Guilford.
Loehlin, J. C., McCrae, R. R., Costa, P. T., Jr., & John, O. P. (1998). Heritabilities of common and measure-specific components of the Big Five personality factors. Journal of Research in Personality, 32, 431-453.
McAdams, D. P. (1992). The five-factor model in personality: A critical appraisal. Journal of Personality, 60, 329-361.
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., Jr. (1996). Toward a new generation of personality theories: Theoretical contexts for the five-factor model. In J. S. Wiggins (Ed.), The five-factor model of personality: Theoretical perspectives (pp. 51-87). New York: Guilford.
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., Jr. (1997). Personality trait structure as a human universal. American Psychologist, 52, 509-516.
Paunonen, S. V., & Jackson, D. N. (2000). What is beyond the Big Five? Plenty! Journal of Personality, 68, 821-835.
Saucier, G., & Goldberg, L. R. (1998). What is beyond the Big Five? Journal of Personality, 66, 495-524.
Soldz, S., & Vaillant, G. E. (1999). The Big Five personality traits and the life course: A 45-year longitudinal study. Journal of Research in Personality, 33, 208-232.
Last modified January 2001
Home to Great Ideas in Personality
References
~ Flip to top ~
Five-Factor Model Links
"Contributions and Limitations of Cattell's Sixteen Personality Factor Model"
Five-Factor Model: Papers Elsewhere
This paper discusses an early 16-factor model that was a precursor to the current five-factor model. By Heather M. Fehringer.
"The Five-Factor Model: Emergence of a Taxonomic Model for Personality Psychology"
This paper discusses the five-factor model and evaluates the model's merits, concluding that it cannot be considered a great theory--not because it is not great--but because it is not a theory. By Nathan C. Popkins.
"The Five-Factor Model of Personality in the Workplace,"
This paper relates the five-factor model to motivation and performance on the job. By Sean P. Neubert.
"The Big Five Taxonomy"
Five-Factor Model: Websites Elsewhere
This paper is a review of the Big Five. By Frank Fujita.
"The NEO Five Factor Model and Skimming the Surface of the Wetlands of Personality"
This paper in Psybernetika criticizes the five-factor model on many grounds. By Darek Dawda.
The Big Five
Five-Factor Model: Reference Source
This website introduces the Big Five model, describes its differences from other models, and evaluates its merits and limitations. By students of Mike Jordan.
Big Five Personality Test
Here is a free, on-line, 50-item personality questionnaire that will tell you how you score on the dimensions of the five-factor model (but not their specific facets). By Frank J. Sulloway.
Big Five Quickstart
This website is an introduction to the five-factor model for human resources professionals. By Pierce J. Howard and Jane Mitchell Howard.
Google Web Directory: Five-Factor Model
This page contains numerous links to websites on the five-factor model rank-ordered by popularity. By Google.
International Personality Item Pool: A Scientific Collaboratory for the Development of Advanced Measures of Personality and Other Individual Differences
This website is an attempt to develop "a broad-bandwidth, public-domain personality inventory measuring the lower-level facets of several five-factor models." By Lewis R. Goldberg.
IPIP Representation of the NEO-PI-R
Here is a free, on-line, 300-item personality questionnaire that will tell you how you score on the dimensions of the five-factor model and their specific facets. A 120-item short form, although available, can be expected to be less reliable than the long form. By John A. Johnson.
On-Line Personality Test
Here is another free, on-line, 50-item personality questionnaire that measures the dimensions of the five-factor model (but not their specific facets). If you have already taken this test before, the authors request that that you use the retest version. By Tom Buchanan, Lewis R. Goldberg, and John A. Johnson.
Open Directory: Five-Factor Model
This page contains numerous links to websites on the five-factor model ordered alphabetically. By the Open Directory Project.
Suggested Readings
A list of suggested readings on this topic is also available. By G. Scott Acton.
~ Flip to top ~
Comments?